Path: news.nzbot.com!border1.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.11.MISMATCH!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe24.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Emmett BADASS Gulley <fake@fakeemail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.southern-charms
Subject: Re: Southern Charms Removal Posts
Message-ID: <76a698ppuaq2cirbg7jq6c41q7l4ecc4cf@4ax.com>
References: <507488p0mq93um3lhpidv0b51m5fb12oq1@4ax.com> <MPG.2aefca8a84e3ecf8989683@news.usenetserver.com> <mQwks.5661$6r1.988@en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 78
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsrazor.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 02:03:24 UTC
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 22:03:22 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 4077
X-Original-Bytes: 4270
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.southern-charms:12523
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:47:30 GMT, justwonderin <really@youthink.com>
wrote:
>vetteguy <driving@my.car.com> wrote in news:MPG.2aefca8a84e3ecf8989683
>@news.usenetserver.com:
>
>> In article <507488p0mq93um3lhpidv0b51m5fb12oq1@4ax.com>,
>> Phoenix@nospam.phoenixind.knology.net says...
>>>
>>> Notice how theyre from the skanks of Southern Charms and even a
>>> Southern Gent who never would have been posted here. I dont remember
>>> some of those names even being posted here
>>
>> let alone that theya re using thier "stage name" adn adding the "SC #"
>>
>> and every letter has grammar that is totally incorect and simular
>
>
>Well, my current provider is listening and has removed everything, so
>they're paying attention to it.
>
>Not really caring personally about either side, but now my interest is
>piqued:
>$7 Million awarded in damages? Are the girls all getting their cut?
>I guess the male side of the site are also getting their amounts, too.
>
>Hmmm.so that equates to (not counting the 60 Southern Gents, who are
>silent on the matter I can only assume from the earlier posts):
>
>805 individual women each getting 9,000 bucks, (assuming the site owner
>is sincerely worried about each one that he ensures they each get 100%
>of the damages, not bloody likely of course). So then if we make the
>assumption that the average normal joe buys a 3 month membership, the
>retrieval of damages for any one single girl would equate to a redress
>of damages of about 300 paid memberships.
>
>So my line of thinking goes as follows: 300 memberships @ $9,000 =
>$36K/year (before taxes)/model.
>Does each model really have that many members? Or do they have a whole
>lot more,potentially offsetting any projected losses?
>Do the newsgroup providers have metrics on how many photos have actually
>been downloaded so that a true assesment of how many months of content
>and true loss of revenue can be made?
>What fees do each model have to pay towards the site owner to be
>included on the site. Are they entitled to a refund of that as a
>separate claim, if damages do indeed exist and can be substantiated?
>Is SC attempting to go after all the adult forums perpetuating the WWW
>that are also posting this content? The newsgroups still seem to be an
>obscure source and can hardly be considered the "source of all
>distribution", right?
>
>
>Or am I really overthinking this and missing something (probably)?
What I think is going on is that someone is pulling our chains.
The defendants in the case don't exist PERIOD.
PLUS, I have heard that someone is CANCELLING each post of the SC
girls in the Ng's.
If one provider pulled all the pics at one time, then they all would
be removed across the usenet realm.
I am on Newsrazor and so far, they have been the last to resist
removing the pics.
There are NO more sc pics in any newsgroups now and I am very IRATE
and will soon be contacting SC myself.
I have seen over on yahoo that they are even pulling pics that girls
have given their permission to people to share and post.
This stinks and I have talked to sonny and she stated that she knew
NOTHING about a lawsuit filed by SC the company.
so take this FWIW and raise some hell
>
|
|