On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:39:38 -0500, Bill Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:09:05 GMT, Brooks <Brooks@Baltimore.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:32:33 -0500, Bill Williams wrote:
>>
>>> On 16 Jan 2015 09:43:52 GMT, homebox@web.de (oldhomer) wrote:
>>>
>>> The second RAR segment went "dud," as did two of the largest PAR
>>> files. I don't mean that they came through partially, but rather that
>>> they were so broken that nothing but an error message downloaded.
>>>
>>> Any chance of replenishment?
>>
>>Again, maybe you would be better off using the included Par files.
>
> That's really, REALLY helpful, considering that when a PAR file is
> totally busted (i.e., nothing appears on an attempt to download the
> damned thing) there's not enough PAR data available to reconstruct the
> missing RAR segment. Or segments.
>
> [/sarc]
>
> Got any PRACTICABLE suggestions?
Instead of bitchin' and moanin' here, why don't you discuss with your
usenet provider, because the three .rar files here unpacked without
issue. Didn't need the pars at all. Or, you are attempting to pull them
down before the files have fully populated their servers.
Again, no issue here.
|
|