On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:09:05 GMT, Brooks <Brooks@Baltimore.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:32:33 -0500, Bill Williams wrote:
>
>> On 16 Jan 2015 09:43:52 GMT, homebox@web.de (oldhomer) wrote:
>>
>> The second RAR segment went "dud," as did two of the largest PAR files.
>> I don't mean that they came through partially, but rather that they were
>> so broken that nothing but an error message downloaded.
>>
>> Any chance of replenishment?
>
>Again, maybe you would be better off using the included Par files.
That's really, REALLY helpful, considering that when a PAR file
is totally busted (i.e., nothing appears on an attempt to download
the damned thing) there's not enough PAR data available to
reconstruct the missing RAR segment. Or segments.
[/sarc]
Got any PRACTICABLE suggestions?
|
|