In reply to "[HELL_mary]" who wrote the following:
> In article <i2lodbdhmvbc0ecdvps6mf0anvi0amlcpd@4ax.com>, t0b0
> <t0b0@t0b0.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 08:40:27 -0600, "[HELL_mary]"
> > <kevin.moore@chromakey.org> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <56dc2f61$0$38512$b1db1813$62b0a5a8@news.astraweb.com>, -_-
> > > <who@whatwhere.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In reply to "[HELL_mary]" who wrote the following:
> > > >
> > > > > In article <56dbb370$0$9469$b1db1813$b96576b3@news.astraweb.com>, -_-
> > > > > <who@whatwhere.invalid> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > These files are better then you need! Stick to the other flac goups!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 24bit are (or almost) SACD quality for listening to only. They are
> > > > > > big
> > > > > > &
> > > > > > downgrading the to mp3 or CD is IDIOTIC! Not to mention; stupid,
> > > > > > silly,
> > > > > > foolish,
> > > > > > witless, brainless, mindless, thoughtless, unintelligent
> > > > >
> > > > > The world doesn't revolve around how the files you upload are listened
> > > > > to, bub. On my home system I listen to them as FLACs. I don't have a
> > > > > portable FLAC player or an SACD player in my car so 320kbps MP3's are
> > > > > my only alternative as of now. On top of that, a lot of the CDs you
> > > > > post aren't readily available any more and even with the loss in
> > > > > quality they are still the best sounding versions out there. How and
> > > > > why does that make me a noob, idiotic, stupid, silly, foolish,
> > > > > witless,
> > > > > brainless, mindless, thoughtless, unintelligent? I live and breathe
> > > > > music and I have for most of my 54 years, so I don't appreciate being
> > > > > belittled by the likes of you for the way I listen to it and I'm sure
> > > > > others here feel the same way.
> > > > >
> > > > > Have you even compared a properly encoded LAME Stereo 320 MP3 made
> > > > > from
> > > > > these remastered SACD files to one created from the original 44/16
> > > > > releases? There's a HUGE difference in quality, but if you're too much
> > > > > of a fidelity snob, I guess you won't bother.
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you really going to try and dictate how "your" files are treated
> > > > > and who can visit this group to download them? Why do you even care?
> > > > > It
> > > > > doesn't affect you or your life even a little bit.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd be careful about calling someone a noob too. I've been on Usenet
> > > > > since the late 80's and later helped charter and create many of the
> > > > > audio groups you probably now enjoy. Looks like *you* are the noob,
> > > > > you
> > > > > arrogant asshole.
> > > >
> > > > ASSHOLE! GTFO of a group you don't understand Meathead!
> > > > There are plenty of plain flac & mp3 groups you can get shit from!
> > > > mp3s are for when whe had dial up. I have HHDs full of them I never
> > > > lisen
> > > > to.
> > > > You & your truck need to go fuck yourself!
> > > >
> > > > When I started pRon was no bigger then a thumbnail.
> > > > Movies where VCD, then SVCD, the DVD & now 1080P.
> > > > Pictures & wallpapers from 10 years ago are garbage now.
> > > > Propperly encoded mp3s BS! 320 is as far as they go!
> > > > Why are you even in a 24bit group! Am I just feeding trols now?
> > >
> > > Like I said: Arrogant asshole. Thanks for proving my point. Again.
> > >
> > > You still seem to be at a loss understanding that the files you post
> > > are REMASTERS that are (in general) a huge step up in production
> > > quality from original 44/16 CDs. The remastering alone makes it worth
> > > the bump in file size and storage. Why is it that you don't get that?
> > >
> > > For your comfort, please know that I'll still be here, quietly
> > > downloading "your" files. Hell... I might even re-encode some of them
> > > to Joint Stereo 128kbps MP3's just to piss you off even more.
> > >
> > > Have a nice day.
> >
> >
> > Whoah! HELL_mary, you Holly Holm'd his ass! It'll be interesting to
> > see how long it takes ' d ' to take his ball and go home, never to
> > return to post any big-time stuff for us small-timers.
> >
> > d, man I thought you were a decent guy/gal. I guess my 60+ years on
> > the planet haven't taught me everything there is to know about people.
> >
> > t0b0
> > A 'noob' with 20+ years on Usenet.
> > Happily d'loading all d's stuff and converting it to MP3
>
> Yeah... it takes all kinds I suppose.
>
> He seems to think that we all have high-end, expensive home systems
> (which I do) or doodads to play these files when away from home (I
> don't). He totally disregards the fact that the remastering alone makes
> these worth grabbing for the uptick in mastering/production and sonic
> quality that's still evident even re-encoded to MP3s.
>
> I still don't get why he even cares in the first place! He's deemed us
> unworthy to even visit the 24-bit group much less [gasp!] have the
> audacity to actually download his precious files. It's like we're
> committing some sort of sacrilege by daring to use the files as we see
> fit, especially since he didn't buy the CDs or rip most of them in the
> first place. "Here's $100 for you. It's right here where you can get it
> easily. You can only spend it on what I tell you though." Jerk.
Yeah D/Led 2 to 4 gigs and make them 128 or even 320s mp3s is brilliant!
There are plenty of mp3 groups & regular size flac groups.
I don't need to D/Led the pars & reposting here.
The only complainers here are
the converters & burners.
--
--------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v7.0 Beta 10
Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
------------------- ----- ---- -- -
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
|