On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:49:49 -0700, Odibil <od@nospam.net> wrote:
Are additonal posts of AMS models unwanted here?
>There is such a difference in production quality it is hard to say. The
>NS shoots are way better in every way. They somehow manage to have the
>girls come across as more sexy while revealing less. I could go on
>about all the reasons but won't bore you with it. Except for two: NS
>knows how to direct models to get the most of them most of the time.
>The whole look is cleaner, less seedy.
>
>Beyond that, both L & C have their moments but I don't think they hold
>a candle to Lexie, Amanda, early Diana nor some of the new ones. (I
>have only seen samples.)
>
>In article <nd7ot8pa5d2m34hnsq22s5hspt1ig6riqd@4ax.com>, Dakota
><wanderer@badlands.org> wrote:
>
>> Do you consider one or both of them more attractive than any active
>> Newstar model?
|
|