Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From: swlabr <swlabr@cre.am>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.totty
Subject: Re: Cherish and Liliana
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:16:20 -0400
Message-ID: <9c6pt8p192pjjce1jl8ap5gpoj0it9dc58@4ax.com>
References: <nd7ot8pa5d2m34hnsq22s5hspt1ig6riqd@4ax.com> <090720131049497598%od@nospam.net>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.00.32.1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ccb6a586.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=MlfSgg11d_k^5mDXS]l4MgL?0kYOcDh@jMIPGNlI[_GaI7g=bIdTQPl_cW1P3eR]BaB?dW?mdli1m`Oa4n;dB9RiH2E`i7A24kl:k05ecEceDj
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.totty:7685
On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:49:49 -0700, Odibil <od@nospam.net> wrote:
Are additonal posts of AMS models unwanted here?
>There is such a difference in production quality it is hard to say. The
>NS shoots are way better in every way. They somehow manage to have the
>girls come across as more sexy while revealing less. I could go on
>about all the reasons but won't bore you with it. Except for two: NS
>knows how to direct models to get the most of them most of the time.
>The whole look is cleaner, less seedy.
>
>Beyond that, both L & C have their moments but I don't think they hold
>a candle to Lexie, Amanda, early Diana nor some of the new ones. (I
>have only seen samples.)
>
>In article <nd7ot8pa5d2m34hnsq22s5hspt1ig6riqd@4ax.com>, Dakota
><wanderer@badlands.org> wrote:
>
>> Do you consider one or both of them more attractive than any active
>> Newstar model?
|
|