On 14 Dec 2012 19:35:59 GMT, name witheld <email> wrote:
>cowbell <cowbell@dairy.farm> wrote in
>news:9unmc8lkn96v6k3bpavjeelavp1l333oqb@4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:32:07 -0600, Saul Rothard <never@no.mo> wrote:
>>
>> Nothing, for your personal use. Now, there are two different files,
>> the original and your compressed version, out there on the internet.
>> You could be a "good" poster and rename your file as being altered so
>> collectors would be aware that your file is not the original. As it
>> stands, your version is the equivalent of spam that inevitably shows
>> up to everyones' detriment.
>>
>> -- cb
>>
>
>spam? SPAM?? You got nerve! Calling spam a single pic demonstrating an
>alternate way to post. A series of pics posted at close to 4 Mb each pic
>is very impolite to the group.
>If you really believe what you wrote, you got a lot to learn about
>usenet. "Collectors" with half a brain can read and see this is a
>smaller copy of an original post.
>And who are you? Did you just change your nick? All the years I been
>Lurking (yes I am a shameless lurker) I never heard of you.
>Have a nice day!
>
My posts are not impolite to the group, they are a unique gift to the
group. I am not going to compress professional photos, which is what
these are.
Feel free to ignore my posts if you don't like them and think the
pictures should be smaller.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.totty/7567', 'Re: What's wrong with just a little compression? - "becca10_204.jpg" 340.7 kBytes yEnc')){kind=link}