On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:57:04 -0600, Tam O'Shanter <tos@erins.greensod>
wrote:
>Nothing. It's better.
It is NOT better. Not when it comes to profesional photography, which
is what these are. That's what makes them unique. They are real tween
models, doing fashion for a professional photographer. They typically
shoot that large so it can be printed or worked on in photo shop
before publication. Photographers typically do not compress their
files at all so they adjust white balance, brightness, exposure, etc.
That's what makes these pictures unique, something different for the
group. These are not taken as part of some pay site for girls to
pretend model so only pedophiles can buy their pictures. They are
modeling for catalogs, in store displays and ads. So you're going to
get large files. And you're also going to get better lighting, better
color, better pictures.
So if you see me post a few here and there and think they're bloated,
don't open them. I'm not going to compress them and post what
everyone else posts on here. I think these are simply beautiful just
the way they are and they certainly are different and new for this or
any other group.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.totty/7566', 'Re: What's wrong with just a little compression? - "becca10_204.jpg" 340.7 kBytes yEnc')){kind=link}