It is common usenet courtesy to rename a compressed image from the original. Though I do agree that the originals
were horribly bloated, but people are free to re-compress on their computers. I recompress CandyDoll stuff to
about 1/5 the original size with a Q factor of 80 with no visual loss of quality. But I would never repost one of
those images since it would conflict with the CD csv.
--
* Posted with NewsLeecher v3.0 Beta 7
* http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.totty/7564', 'Re: What's wrong with just a little compression? - "becca10_204.jpg" 340.7 kBytes yEnc')){kind=link}