On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:26:39 -0800, cowbell <cowbell@dairy.farm>
wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:32:07 -0600, Saul Rothard <never@no.mo> wrote:
>
>Nothing, for your personal use. Now, there are two different files,
>the original and your compressed version, out there on the internet.
>You could be a "good" poster and rename your file as being altered so
>collectors would be aware that your file is not the original. As it
>stands, your version is the equivalent of spam that inevitably shows
>up to everyones' detriment.
>
> -- cb
Idiot. Why would you waste time typing that, let alone defend a
bloated file that you think needs to have its own spot on the fucking
Internet.
|
|