On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:58:40 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>On 21 Jul 2014 16:29:16 GMT, ricky@example.org (Ricky) wrote:
>
>
>So you pull the worst Ned shot and compare to the best Nick shot and
>that's your proof?
>
>C'mon, what the real beef here? Just because there is a blue
>background you think it's so much better? Did you know that Ned has
>many picture sets with different background? No, you don't know that
>because you're talking out of your ass, like all trolls do. You just
>like to troll and not base your findings on reality.
1. You have said that white backgrounds are great.
2. Many have said that they're not.
3. I posted an example to show that they're not.
4. You're crying and accusing me of trolling.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic/282', 'Re: Ned 'quality' vs. Maxim 1 file - "mary_t_model_mix_teenmodeling_tv_002.jpg" yEnc (01/14)')){kind=link}