| 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail From: Ricky <ricky@example.org>
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic
 Subject: Re: Ned 'quality' vs. Maxim 1 file - "mary_t_model_mix_teenmodeling_tv_002.jpg" yEnc (01/14)
 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:02:00 +0300
 Message-ID: <hgkss9tirg7b939o3ts42dg5o09apra97n@4ax.com>
 References: <53cd3fd9$1$58728$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com> <l9vrs9pk58bl4qls7jjjm3ojs8p6ebe53a@4ax.com>
 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 Lines: 19
 Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
 NNTP-Posting-Host: 480f70d3.news.astraweb.com
 X-Trace: DXC=hI0dc6Vh^>86fPZ:J:\J]<L?0kYOcDh@:_FAFF\Vf;U9PjZ>HOhn>=1BZ<AX`0A\J3]BFbgm_ej;2:oG@c4UM=N7;9f^JKU`2\:jcl0;<\nbm3
 X-Received-Body-CRC: 4258633895
 X-Received-Bytes: 1763
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic:282
 
 On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:58:40 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
 
 >On 21 Jul 2014 16:29:16 GMT, ricky@example.org (Ricky) wrote:
 >
 >
 >So you pull the worst Ned shot and compare to the best Nick shot and
 >that's your proof?
 >
 >C'mon, what the real beef here? Just because there is a blue
 >background you think it's so much better? Did you know that Ned has
 >many picture sets with different background? No, you don't know that
 >because you're talking out of your ass, like all trolls do. You just
 >like to troll and not base your findings on reality.
 
 1. You have said that white backgrounds are great.
 2. Many have said that they're not.
 3. I posted an example to show that they're not.
 4. You're crying and accusing me of trolling.
 
 
 | 
 
 |