On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:30:19 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:41:02 +0300, Ricky <ricky@example.org> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:43:00 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 06:33:19 +0200, elonafan@almaty.city wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 08:24:23 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 10:51:11 +0200, elonafan@almaty.city wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Too old now. She's done. Put a cow bell around her neck and send her
>>>>>off to the fields.
>>>>
>>>>Come on OB, you know when a girl becomes
>>>> "too old" for we pervs well <bg>
>>>>
>>>>Anyway, tell Ned that last Mary's set, in the dark background section,
>>>>is ok, please. White background is awful instead, it makes subjects
>>>>flat, washing away all light effects.
>>>
>>>
>>>Nah,white background is good.
>>
>>No, while elonafan is an annoying cunt he's right about the white
>>background problem in Ned's sets.
>>
>>It's no coincidence that these other photographers who know
>>what they're doing never uses all white backgrounds.
>>
>>Ned is also lacking in photo editing and processing skills. Photos are
>>grainy and some of the samples posted here are awfully compressed.
>>
>>I would _never_ spend my hard earned money on something so bad.
>
>
>White background is fine and the samples here are just that: SAMPLES.
>They are not the full size high res photos. The full size ones average
>6mb each. Too large to post here.
>
>But you cheap bastards wouldn't know that becuase you never buy
>anything.
And another thing, the photogs from the Ukraine don't shoot white
background because they are too cheap to pay for a studio and they
don't know how. It's much more difficult to shoot with a white
background and light the subject properly and get the white balance
right. They set all their controls to automatic and shoot outside or
against colored sheets that they hang in their living rooms.
Open up any fashion magazine and what do you see? White backgrounds!
Dipshits.
Frankly, I don't give a shit about the background, I'm looking at the
model.
And one more time: you cheap bastards never buy anything so how the
hell would you know how big the pictures are? All you see are highly
compressed samples on here.
Ned's pictures are the highest res, most clear pictures I've ever seen
on the internet. Truly professional work.
I'd post a sample on here but it's too large and my reader won't allow
it.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|