On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:41:02 +0300, Ricky <ricky@example.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:43:00 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 06:33:19 +0200, elonafan@almaty.city wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 08:24:23 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 10:51:11 +0200, elonafan@almaty.city wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Too old now. She's done. Put a cow bell around her neck and send her
>>>>off to the fields.
>>>
>>>Come on OB, you know when a girl becomes
>>> "too old" for we pervs well <bg>
>>>
>>>Anyway, tell Ned that last Mary's set, in the dark background section,
>>>is ok, please. White background is awful instead, it makes subjects
>>>flat, washing away all light effects.
>>
>>
>>Nah,white background is good.
>
>No, while elonafan is an annoying cunt he's right about the white
>background problem in Ned's sets.
>
>It's no coincidence that these other photographers who know
>what they're doing never uses all white backgrounds.
>
>Ned is also lacking in photo editing and processing skills. Photos are
>grainy and some of the samples posted here are awfully compressed.
>
>I would _never_ spend my hard earned money on something so bad.
White background is fine and the samples here are just that: SAMPLES.
They are not the full size high res photos. The full size ones average
6mb each. Too large to post here.
But you cheap bastards wouldn't know that becuase you never buy
anything.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic/251', 'Re: She's baaAAACK !! - "elonavarsitypreview.jpg" (1/7) 1.0 MBytes yEnc')){kind=link}