Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com> wrote in
news:m0dhm30uc5@drn.newsguy.com:
> In article <pydWv.342597$9I4.188041@fx35.am4>, Eddie Furred says...
>>
>>Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com> wrote in
>>news:m01ksa054d@drn.newsguy.com:
>>
>>> In article <5423b1be$0$12012$c3e8da3$536f98dd@news.astraweb.com>,
>>> Bucly says...
>>>>
>>>>Thank you !
>>>>
>>>>Bucly
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Red Girl would have been better off with larger implants...Go Big or
>>> Don't Go at All..
>>>
>>>
>>> *
>>>
>>
>>When you start posting Miloch perhaps we will accept your
>>"observations". Until that time we'd be very grateful if you would
>>STFU!
>>
>>Both of the "Private Arschficker" scenes were great. Thank you for
>>posting them Trousersnake.
>>
>>Cheers
>>
>>Eddie
>
> Yo! EddieBoy...sounds like you speak for the entire group. Correct
> me if I'm wrong but in an open forum, are you saying that one has to
> post images or his 'observations' won't be accepted?
>
> By everyone?
>
>
> *
>
>
As no-one appears to be saying anything else then perhaps I do represent
the group!
I will correct you because you are wrong. No, I am not saying that to make
observations is not allowed unless you post images. What I am saying is
that you need to accept that what you specifically want is not necessarily
that which others want, and, conversely, whilst some things may not be to
our liking, we accept that it may be to others. At the same time, we do not
continually criticise the work of others negatively. You might earn more of
a right to and respect for your comments on the work of others if we could
see, and criticise your work.
Then again that's not really part of an egocentrics agenda, is it?
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.nylons/96', 'Re: Vintage......... - "Private.ArschfickerSc.3.jpg"')){kind=link}