In article <jp_Wv.420123$Fy6.30338@fx25.am4>, Eddie Furred says...
>
>Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com> wrote in
>news:m0dhm30uc5@drn.newsguy.com:
>
>> In article <pydWv.342597$9I4.188041@fx35.am4>, Eddie Furred says...
>>>
>>>Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com> wrote in
>>>news:m01ksa054d@drn.newsguy.com:
>>>
>>>> In article <5423b1be$0$12012$c3e8da3$536f98dd@news.astraweb.com>,
>>>> Bucly says...
>>>>>
>>>>>Thank you !
>>>>>
>>>>>Bucly
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Red Girl would have been better off with larger implants...Go Big or
>>>> Don't Go at All..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>
>>>When you start posting Miloch perhaps we will accept your
>>>"observations". Until that time we'd be very grateful if you would
>>>STFU!
>>>
>>>Both of the "Private Arschficker" scenes were great. Thank you for
>>>posting them Trousersnake.
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>
>>>Eddie
>>
>> Yo! EddieBoy...sounds like you speak for the entire group. Correct
>> me if I'm wrong but in an open forum, are you saying that one has to
>> post images or his 'observations' won't be accepted?
>>
>> By everyone?
>>
>>
>> *
>>
>>
>
>As no-one appears to be saying anything else then perhaps I do represent
>the group!
>
>I will correct you because you are wrong. No, I am not saying that to make
>observations is not allowed unless you post images. What I am saying is
>that you need to accept that what you specifically want is not necessarily
>that which others want, and, conversely, whilst some things may not be to
>our liking, we accept that it may be to others. At the same time, we do not
>continually criticise the work of others negatively. You might earn more of
>a right to and respect for your comments on the work of others if we could
>see, and criticise your work.
>
>Then again that's not really part of an egocentrics agenda, is it?
YAWN....
*
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.nylons/97', 'Re: Vintage......... - "Private.ArschfickerSc.3.jpg"')){kind=link}