> On Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:04:53 -0500, retrowavelength
> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>>> http://www.avg.com
>>> begin 644 anita-hendrix-18.jpg
>>>
>>> Attachment decoded: anita-hendrix-18.jpg
>>> `
>>> end
>>
>>This model is seen in sets CB-24, H-84, NC-29, X-L-60, X-L-62, XXH-34,
>>XXH- 38, Y-129, Y-130.
>>
>>I've never been convinced that this is Anita Hendrix. I know it has
>>been claimed at myarchives & perhaps suggested here. If a skin dots
>>analysis has any value, the CB-24 lady is not Anita Hendrix of RE-9 &
>>plywood background sets.
>>
>>--rwl
>
> I always thought that Anita Hendricks (RE-9) and Anita Hendrix (XL-60)
> were two separate entities. But, I am old and easily confused.
>
I think an issue, though, is that there's no evidence that the X-L-60
(etc.) model is either Hendricks or Hendrix. The only claim I recall for
her being Anita H is from a myarchives user and that site has a spotty
record for accuracy.
--rwl
|
|
 anita-hendrix-18.jpg (1/1) 5 7')){kind=link}