Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 14:58:09 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: (Anita Hendrix) anita-hendrix-18.jpg (1/1) 5 7
From: retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com>
References: <1K6dnd2fgebZZ2TEnZ2dnUU7-LXNnZ2d@giganews.com> <BOudnZ9WnsxYkWfEnZ2dnUU7-SHNnZ2d@giganews.com> <3j5uvc58mvaa4b7jkhj3ifn86t2q8qdbcp@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Message-ID: <Y8-dnYVA_6f85mLEnZ2dnUU7-V2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 14:58:09 -0600
Lines: 35
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-zHcWwsygMpOyPbFq9IQNNJ/gdBnYqbophgEKUpGBkL7q+Cx4eDF38N530yxyPu6+9ce4GLWzCTSrUic!LxYw1fByYoZp64V9w+bzwelzc3indzxuA5FWGNgN0AP+2Bu0EWg4PyEHaB4my9Hw/UKPLSDQ97E=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2151
X-Received-Bytes: 2273
X-Received-Body-CRC: 21706768
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:13818
> On Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:04:53 -0500, retrowavelength
> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>>> http://www.avg.com
>>> begin 644 anita-hendrix-18.jpg
>>>
>>> Attachment decoded: anita-hendrix-18.jpg
>>> `
>>> end
>>
>>This model is seen in sets CB-24, H-84, NC-29, X-L-60, X-L-62, XXH-34,
>>XXH- 38, Y-129, Y-130.
>>
>>I've never been convinced that this is Anita Hendrix. I know it has
>>been claimed at myarchives & perhaps suggested here. If a skin dots
>>analysis has any value, the CB-24 lady is not Anita Hendrix of RE-9 &
>>plywood background sets.
>>
>>--rwl
>
> I always thought that Anita Hendricks (RE-9) and Anita Hendrix (XL-60)
> were two separate entities. But, I am old and easily confused.
>
I think an issue, though, is that there's no evidence that the X-L-60
(etc.) model is either Hendricks or Hendrix. The only claim I recall for
her being Anita H is from a myarchives user and that site has a spotty
record for accuracy.
--rwl
|
|
 anita-hendrix-18.jpg (1/1) 5 7')){kind=link}