On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 14:08:01 -0500, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 22:04:26 -0500, retrowavelength
>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:36:07 -0500, retrowavelength
>>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news:59690A25.1040006 @yahoo.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --rwl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing to contribute this time, except my initial reaction to
>>>>>> this pic was Bonnie Logan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>There will probably be a number of these that are either actual
>>>>>alternate names for models (& I haven't connected the dots) or some
>>>>>may turn out to be claims by sellers, etc., that are bogus. No way
>>>>>for me to be sure, but the group can discuss them & maybe arrive at
>>>>>a conclusion.
>>>>>
>>>>>--rwl
>>>>
>>>> I always thought it was Bonnie as well. This image also appeared in
>>>> Sir Knight Vol 2 No 11.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Umm, what name was it that I sent? These older posts seem to be rolled
>>>off my provider (yeah, what's up with that).
>>>
>>>--rwl
>>
>> Wanda Jackson.
>>
>
>Andrea Jackson (attach)? I looked at the sent folder & didn't see a Wanda
>(or I think I didn't).
>
>--rwl
Yes. Andrea Jackson. Wanda Jackson was a musciican. At any rate,
the same image also appeard in Sir Knight Vol 2 No 11.
|
|