| 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail From: Mike Sharona <comrade.2000REMOVE@REMOVEyahoo.com>
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
 Subject: Re: Name Game Part 2 - 1 attachment
 Sender: Mike Sharona
 Message-ID: <1f8nqctv2nh9qfqo6nde13lsad95mg58fh@4ax.com>
 References: <59690861.2020704@yahoo.com> <59690A25.1040006@yahoo.com> <XnsA7B462C8532FEroakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131> <8pqdndN9Zf66XfbEnZ2dnUU7-aWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <g82aqch09rjo4ejr2vl8lbkfbebgrafs02@4ax.com> <CO6dnUL0A78n4TrEnZ2dnUU7-YHNnZ2d@giganews.com> <rgcfqcpultacdu0htl26v1lrb1bm6cvckk@4ax.com> <IL2dnfNW4beMLTTEnZ2dnUU7-RWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
 Lines: 49
 X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
 Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
 X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
 Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 00:33:10 -0600
 X-Received-Bytes: 2516
 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2016325987
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:13336
 
 On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 14:08:01 -0500, retrowavelength
 <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
 >> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 22:04:26 -0500, retrowavelength
 >> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
 >>
 >>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:36:07 -0500, retrowavelength
 >>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
 >>>>
 >>>>>> retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in
 >>>>>> news:59690A25.1040006 @yahoo.com:
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>>> --rwl
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>> Nothing to contribute this time, except my initial reaction to
 >>>>>> this pic was Bonnie Logan.
 >>>>>>
 
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>>There will probably be a number of these that are either actual
 >>>>>alternate names for models (& I haven't connected the dots) or some
 >>>>>may turn out to be claims by sellers, etc., that are bogus. No way
 >>>>>for me to be sure, but the group can discuss them & maybe arrive at
 >>>>>a conclusion.
 >>>>>
 >>>>>--rwl
 >>>>
 >>>> I always thought it was Bonnie as well.  This image also appeared in
 >>>> Sir Knight Vol 2 No 11.
 >>>>
 >>>
 >>>Umm, what name was it that I sent? These older posts seem to be rolled
 >>>off my provider (yeah, what's up with that).
 >>>
 >>>--rwl
 >>
 >> Wanda Jackson.
 >>
 >
 >Andrea Jackson (attach)? I looked at the sent folder & didn't see a Wanda
 >(or I think I didn't).
 >
 >--rwl
 
 Yes.  Andrea Jackson.   Wanda Jackson was a musciican.  At any rate,
 the same image also appeard in Sir Knight Vol 2 No 11.
 
 | 
 
 |