> On 2016-09-08 07:27:37 +0000, retrowavelength said:
>
>> >I'm always happier with a name in print even when
>> >I have no doubt about who it is.
>>
>> Me, too! There's quite a lot of names that I accept as fact, and so do
>> lots of people, but for which I've never actually seen the physical
>> evidence or the train of logic that determined the name.
>>
>> --rwl
>
> I agree with both of you, and that we all want referenced names.
> However, if there is reasonable agreement on a given name amounst the
> group I will use it. It is much easier to use and remember a name than
> the "X-Y-Z 17" girl, e.g. Plus, we've seen several with many different
> names or variations of spelling.
>
> An exception for me is the gal that is posted on myarchives as "Craven
> Morehead." To me that seems too obvious a play on words. Then again,
> something may pop up that varifies it.
>
>
I'll also continue to use the 'accepted' names until something else turns
up. It's easier for most folks to associate a name with a model even if
it's only a convenient tag, not an authentic name. However, visitors may
see the name & maybe not realize it's not authentic. Buuuuutttt...we do the
best we can! :-)
--rwl
|
|
')){kind=link}