alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintagePrev. Next
Re: A Few More Sets - File 39 of 40 - Z-60.jpg (1/1)
retrowavelength (retrowavelength@yahoo.com) 2016/09/08 23:04

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:04:50 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: A Few More Sets - File 39 of 40 - Z-60.jpg (1/1)
From: retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com>
References: <mZ-dnSqBiLwPU1DKnZ2dnUU7-a2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <3lt0tb5ogahbbrumris8f4nkmmoojkn00l@4ax.com> <57D112E9.8060201@yahoo.com> <2016090806401573755-@news.giganews.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Message-ID: <E8Cdnf0yrO9u30_KnZ2dnUU7-bnNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:04:51 -0500
Lines: 30
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-GcS3fscZEYwCSCCclc5LPK7QQfK5Oh80RXhfKW5x5qfrUX0hkQXeGAECpnUIk9jvt/iNy1pZeut52tg!AGhqIC6A7yTQlhNiCsr+PAfs3KO+MIYebRGiezxCAzgKF86PYHMcpjryZ1s1eH0GN4UWKzcoEJDs
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2353
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2603190769
X-Received-Bytes: 2619
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:11626

> On 2016-09-08 07:27:37 +0000, retrowavelength said:
>
>>  >I'm always happier with a name in print even when
>>  >I have no doubt about who it is.
>>
>> Me, too! There's quite a lot of names that I accept as fact, and so do
>> lots of people, but for which I've never actually seen the physical
>> evidence or the train of logic that determined the name.
>>
>> --rwl
>
> I agree with both of you, and that we all want referenced names.
> However, if there is reasonable agreement on a given name amounst the
> group I will use it. It is much easier to use and remember a name than
> the "X-Y-Z 17" girl, e.g. Plus, we've seen several with many different
> names or variations of spelling.
>
> An exception for me is the gal that is posted on myarchives as "Craven
> Morehead." To me that seems too obvious a play on words. Then again,
> something may pop up that varifies it.
>
>

I'll also continue to use the 'accepted' names until something else turns
up. It's easier for most folks to associate a name with a model even if
it's only a convenient tag, not an authentic name. However, visitors may
see the name & maybe not realize it's not authentic. Buuuuutttt...we do the
best we can! :-)

--rwl

Follow-ups:12345678
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite