On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 11:19:44 -0500, Randy Wang <r@ndy.wang> wrote:
>In article <qgbaadhgcih5cb2ft1pp1mp4o56cbdmaj7@4ax.com>,
><Moxy@127.0.0.1> wrote:
put the question out there.
>
>The name rings a sort of generic or general alarm bell here ... I'm not
>familiar with that stuff, but wasn't PV one of the imprints, or
>sub-studio names, of one of those Russian kiddy-pr0n outfits that got
>busted years ago?
This is a bit of a wake up call for me. I NEVER want to have anything
to do with the content mentioned above.
I have a large resource of adult erotic content. But I find that I
have collected a large amount of historic content that I haven't
properly reviewed/assessed. This set being an example.
I'm quite shaken and feel quite stupid.
I'm glad that the group has alerted me to this issue, purges will be
relentless.Proper assessment will commence henceforth.
Thank you RW.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller/7116', 'Re: pretty-virgins.com _contactsheets [01/30] "PrettyVirgins-0001-index_001.jpg"')){kind=link}