On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 11:19:44 -0500, Randy Wang <r@ndy.wang> wrote:
>In article <qgbaadhgcih5cb2ft1pp1mp4o56cbdmaj7@4ax.com>,
><Moxy@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>> Not sure what to make of these. I have a collection of 380 sets,
>> 7.5GB in total. Was about to sent them to the bit bucket, but decided
>> to create these samples and put the question out there.
>
>The name rings a sort of generic or general alarm bell here ... I'm not
>familiar with that stuff, but wasn't PV one of the imprints, or
>sub-studio names, of one of those Russian kiddy-pr0n outfits that got
>busted years ago? But maybe I'm wrong and all of those models in the
>PV sets are strictly over 18. Don't know (and I confess that I haven't
>bothered to look at all of the indexes that you posted, only some of
>'em). Unless you're positive that they're all 18+, I wouldn't post.
This was my worry, I haven't even looked through them all, I'll toast
the lot.
I appreciate the feedback. Thank you.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller/7115', 'Re: pretty-virgins.com _contactsheets [01/30] "PrettyVirgins-0001-index_001.jpg"')){kind=link}