On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 02:18:38 -0600, SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
wrote:
> With my systems, I see the worse culprit always being
>Watch4Beauty. One day we'll all thank them for their courage! But as
>it is now, there's a delay in viewing their images consecutively. How
>do you guys handle that? For looking through set folders I've found
>my ACDSee program works better than anything else I have. Yes, W4B
>makes it hard on ACDSee too, somewhat, but a LOT better than anything
>else. Yout better have a scroll-wheel on your mouse though.
I use this for viewing/managing images.
http://www.faststone.org/FSViewerDetail.htm
This also does comprehensive batch resizing/conversion and renaming
(renaming is used frequently by myself).
> I've read recently that NVidia encourages people to only use
>one video card nowadays. Why? Most new software doesn't have the
>capability to use the second card. "What about 4K monitor use?"
>You'll barely be able to play(games) a relatively high-refresh rate
>without dialing down the settings. "So what's the use of having a 4
>or even 8K monitor?" Beats me!
> Talking about video cards...anyone else suspicious about how
>all of a sudden the card makers have leap-frogged way ahead with their
>cards performance? I think someone's done a magic trick or maybe it
>was in anticipation of AMD coming out with their new line-up. Well,
>if you were dumb enough to shell out for those new Titans then "a fool
>and his money are soon parted".
Agreed. I tend not to buy high end graphics cards, due to the high
premium. I have a mid/low range NVidia GTX 750 ( about my limit
budget wise). I prefer to spend the money on the monitor, which is
currently an aging 22"
iiyama, tempted by new 24" panels.
> Maybe anyone else can talk about what they use for their image
>viewers. I'll add that for the most part I use Windows Image & Fax
>viewer that comes with W8(you can downLoad this with W10).
> Btw, you c-o-u-l-d do a batch half-sizing on those W4B's with
>Irfanview. I don't. It's not that hard to set up though. I've tried
>fooling around with it.
|
|