On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:37:51 -0700, Stormin' Norman
<norman@schwarzkopf.in.memorium> wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:29:54 -0700, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)"
><invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:11:52 -0700, Stormin' Norman
>><norman@schwarzkopf.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 23:54:14 -0700, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)"
>>><invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 18 Jun 2018 17:53:08 -0700, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>But the red 1962 Lockheed Jetstar has no engine
>>>>
>>>>EngineS. Four of them. Wonder where they went?
>>>
>>>
>>>I wondered the same thing about the engines and the nacelles too.
>>>
>>>Was never an Elvis fan and just can't imagine undertaking a
>>>restoration on this thing when there are still so many deserving war
>>>birds out there yet to be restored.
>>
>>The Jetstar has always been a favorite of mine; just looks good - even
>>in USAF lizard camo...
>>
>>The very first - twin engined - Jetstar is being restored for the
>>Museum of Flight in Seattle.
>
>Interesting. That motivated me to look up the museum, wow, what a
>beautiful facility. I have put it on my list of places to visit the
>next time I am in that area!
Quite worth it! Don't forget their restoration center a few miles
north at Paine Field. And once you are at Paine Filed, there are
three more (well, 2 1/2...) really nice aviation (and armor) museums.
|
|