>>
> n@@dles, your timing is perfect. This is exactly what is being sought
> after.
>
> A couple months back, Sgt.Pepper posted a heretofore unknown set of LS
> csv's by bourne. If you missed them, I can repost them. Then I
> subsequently posted the first draft of a bible for LS Land. I assume
> you did get that. If not, I can repost.
Ive never seen the bourne csvs but just checked back and grabbed them just
now. At first glance they look not bad. Good to have set of csvs that where
created independantly for comparison as well.
I got your bible back when i first replied to the post. cheers.
>
> The results were as follows:
>
> You, I, & bourne are in 100% agreement for the following 20 LS-Land
> sets:
>
> 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 20, 22, 27, 28, 30, 31, &
> 32.
>
> Additionally, you & I, but not bourne agree on 12, 16, 19, & 24.
>
> As I recall, bourne was never far off, perhaps one or so images failed
> to match. His worst was set 24, Future School, where there were a
> number of unlogoed and unrotated images that finished off the series.
> Of that string of images without logos, everyone that was sideways
> failed his csv. This leads me to believe that either he or his source
> rectified those images first.
>
Thats good to know - thats a fair chunck of lsland covered :) Was worried
we might be in worse shape than that.
With regards to future school - i know that set well. It comes from a rar
floating about on p2p. I grabbed it years ago and remember running it
against my csv and failing dramatically. I suspect bourne made his csv from
that collection.
> There are some other indications that bourne may have had a propensity
> to fix LS' mistakes, but by and large, his csvs hold true. I'd be
> interested in what you think after examining bourne's csvs for those 4
> sets.
>
> Of greater interest to you, perhaps, would be the sets bourne & I
> agree on, but which you flunked. These are LS-Land sets 3, 15, 18, &
> 25. The first three have missing videos entries. Do you need copies
> of these videos? Otherwise, your concern about "extra bytes in the
> images or incorrect headers" is not at issue since all your entries
> for the images are correct.
>
Weird. I was just gonna ask about lsland vids :) I knew I was missing them
and with set 3 i sorta took a gamble that they where kosher :)
If you could post them thatll be great.
I notice that with set 18 there are only 2 vids listed in the bourne csv -
is this correct?? looks like there should be more.
> The last set has a single corrupt file. I'll post a good copy and if
> it passes your scrutiny, that will put set 25 squarely in the triad of
> matching csvs.
>
Cheers for that. Yours is def the good copy. Thats another site signed off
:)
I make that all of lsland complete except 21, 23, 26 and 29.
My 21, 26 and 29 are all incomplete to the extent i dont even have an
ongoing csv for 29.
Ive attached the 2 csvs i have. Could you give them a quick look and post
the missing??
how are the bourne csvs for these sites??
The notes I have say....
lsland21
--------
extra bytes
lsh-016
lsh-018
lsh-019
lsh-024
lsland26
--------
Corrupt...
lhv-009-041
lhv-009-049
lhv-009-051
lhv-009-052
lhv-009-058
lhv-009-083
lsland29
--------
Missing...
lh2-007-025
lh2-017-006
lh2-030-043
Ducky...
lh2-021-100
I cant remember what ducky means :)
one more thing - i dont have anything from old story (or at least listed as
old story :) do you know how to convert to lsland 23?? is it an exact
replica?? or are there differences??
> I'll keep you in the loop as my work progresses. I'm currently
> working at archiving Charming Angels and Gentle Angels.
>
hopefully ua/ga should be good. that one took ages to sort thru. especially
labeling folders etc :(
> Maybe you can answer a question about Charming Angels for me. I
> organized and verified the whole series and issued a csv. Then
> between hfa and myself, we posted all of HL/CA/Chara. Now I discover
> bourne has a csv for the series and my entire set 167 fails to match.
> I look into it and discover all the headers flunk my tests. I must
> have been satisfied with the fact that set 167 passed two other csvs
> (CD & (GS)) and didn't run a header check on it. I've checked all my
> archived posts and p2p downloads, and every copy of ca- 167 is the
> same. Do you know anything about that set or have a copy with good
> headers?
>
hl/ca is one of the sites i never even started on. such a big job an i
didnt have a rip to go from at the time.
sadly it looks like it is completely unorganised :(
the only copy i have of the site was a huge rar posted a couple of years
back but it is incomplete. it is missing the chara sets and i believe a few
of the later ca sets.
im sure i have the chara sets and other sets elsewhere tho and i remember
an issue with 167 at the time so hopefully i have a good copy kicking
about.
shows how long since i checked ca :)
ill let you know.
Regards
n@@dles
|
|