On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:12:35 -0600, n@@dles wrote,
>Thought id try and get a list of all the csvs we have that have been
>finalised and checked over.
>
>Ive attached a text file with a list of all my LS csvs and denoted which
>ones that are finished. (only lsland10 and mr. bills csvs so far).
>
>Can you guys let me know which ones you think are definetely complete with
>no extra bytes in the images or incorrect headers, etc??
>
>I checked them all at the time of creation but mb has posted a few images
>that have proven to be the correct ones for UN that I thought was complete.
>Bloody LS!!!! :)
>
>If we all agree then I think we can say they are done :)
>
n@@dles, your timing is perfect. This is exactly what is being sought after.
A couple months back, Sgt.Pepper posted a heretofore unknown set of LS csv's
by bourne. If you missed them, I can repost them. Then I subsequently
posted the first draft of a bible for LS Land. I assume you did get that.
If not, I can repost.
The results were as follows:
You, I, & bourne are in 100% agreement for the following 20 LS-Land sets:
1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 20, 22, 27, 28, 30, 31, & 32.
Additionally, you & I, but not bourne agree on 12, 16, 19, & 24.
As I recall, bourne was never far off, perhaps one or so images failed to
match. His worst was set 24, Future School, where there were a number of
unlogoed and unrotated images that finished off the series. Of that string
of images without logos, everyone that was sideways failed his csv. This
leads me to believe that either he or his source rectified those images
first.
There are some other indications that bourne may have had a propensity to fix
LS' mistakes, but by and large, his csvs hold true. I'd be interested in
what you think after examining bourne's csvs for those 4 sets.
Of greater interest to you, perhaps, would be the sets bourne & I agree on,
but which you flunked. These are LS-Land sets 3, 15, 18, & 25. The first
three have missing videos entries. Do you need copies of these videos?
Otherwise, your concern about "extra bytes in the images or incorrect
headers" is not at issue since all your entries for the images are correct.
The last set has a single corrupt file. I'll post a good copy and if it
passes your scrutiny, that will put set 25 squarely in the triad of matching
csvs.
I'll keep you in the loop as my work progresses. I'm currently working at
archiving Charming Angels and Gentle Angels.
Maybe you can answer a question about Charming Angels for me. I organized
and verified the whole series and issued a csv. Then between hfa and myself,
we posted all of HL/CA/Chara. Now I discover bourne has a csv for the series
and my entire set 167 fails to match. I look into it and discover all the
headers flunk my tests. I must have been satisfied with the fact that set
167 passed two other csvs (CD & (GS)) and didn't run a header check on it.
I've checked all my archived posts and p2p downloads, and every copy of ca-
167 is the same. Do you know anything about that set or have a copy with
good headers?
--
mr.bill
|
|