In article <XnsA5BF6CD78EC60bgmailc@69.16.179.38>, dr. who?
<noemail@none.com> wrote:
> The pics seem fine to me.
> Personally I don't need HD pics.
> Anyway, it is always the posters choice,
> Thanks for all that you have posted.
I agree with that, and here's a note for androo in case his nose
got put out of joint by what I said in a previous reply about the
*necessarily* very low quality of resized JPEGs. :-0 (The low quality
is just what we're stuck with; it's the nature of lossy encoding algorithms,
which were designed to be only a one-shot deal.) This group's charter, which
can be found at
<ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/control/alt/alt.binaries.nospam.female.short-hair.gz>
does not prohibit posting pics that have been resized or otherwise modified.
So anyone who is so inclined should go right ahead. However, it is a very
good idea, highly recommended, to have your resizing script change the
file names slightly. For instance, "something001.jpg" could become
"something001-resized.jpg" or "something001.sized.jpg". That's truth in
advertising, and it warns the downloaders what to expect.
|
|
 - "Jude-001.jpg" yEnc (1/1) - 001 of 145')){kind=link}