androo <hairtoday@gonetomorr.ow> wrote in
news:3akgcb99cbgmmcgdetfa1ecajll9vgjjr4@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:47:48 -0600, Sono <no@email.com> wrote:
>
>>"androo" <hairtoday@gonetomorr.ow> wrote in
>>news:GqOdnZABROAzMVjLnZ2dnUU7- eWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
>>
>>Thanks again. More great posts.
>>
>>I am curious why you compress the jpgs so heavily though. The quality
>>is terrible
>>
>>Still, I for one appreciate it :)
>
> Fair point. I'm not the ideal person to be posting since I have an
> annoying combination of limited local storage and a restrictive data
> upload cap. The former is only a temporary issue but for the moment
> I'm stuck with the latter.
>
> I can go for fewer but better. The data cap means many HD sets are
> impracticable for me to post full size. Maybe that's not a bad thing
> though.
>
> More and better posters would be good :)
>
The pics seem fine to me.
Personally I don't need HD pics.
Anyway, it is always the posters choice,
Thanks for all that you have posted.
d,w?
|
|
 - "Jude-001.jpg" yEnc (1/1) - 001 of 145')){kind=link}