You think there's actually going to be a new site? I expect the
issue is that the current site isn't generating a lot of revenue
anymore. Hard to tell what the webmaster is getting for material. It
may be a lot of sets that aren't any good. After a lot of activity,
she's disappeared from Twitter again. It takes two to argue. I'm
sure there are issues on both sides.
Still, we can be hopeful things will continue on and content will
improve.
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 22:52:35 -0400, rebar <rebar@rbar.com> wrote:
>Makes sense. I can't see her shooting something genuinely new for a
>site that's closing down in two weeks. I just hope she starts her new
>site with fresh material.
>
>On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 20:51:04 -0400, cc@cereal.net wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 12:50:44 -0400, rebar <rebar@rbar.com> wrote:
>>
>>>As expected, her "New Set" looks to be about 1 to 2 years old.
>>>
>>>Thanks for the upload though, Iam
>>
>>Could be. Didn't the web "master" say there were some leftover
>>photosets (assuming they were shot a while back but initially
>>rejected)?
|
|