alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodelPrev. Next
Re: The New Adventures of Old Christina (sigh) Unlimited download news ..
Flatlander (flatlander47@cox.net) 2014/08/08 09:59

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Flatlander <flatlander47@cox.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel
Subject: Re: The New Adventures of Old Christina (sigh)
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 10:59:56 -0500
Message-ID: <cns9u915p48b3atj8spmlos4gcaauqd9eg@4ax.com>
References: <6fb7u95o08udbbtgtgn4qof73k2k2auspd@4ax.com> <ql78u9t8o3c1e8squqenq6699fef2th1o4@4ax.com> <2pe8u9pmeb2q9sv5j6marducs7h9hvfcio@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9c44d806.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=IVD9VEM_U?E0UO2<>T]L;AL?0kYOcDh@JFO\n83S6E]D=0dk\oh8J?A_9EoVZXGDnN4IG=hAhIjeNm436=:VUnWE9Z;7\OR@jjD_R^Ej9Og_KN
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3739173152
X-Received-Bytes: 2187
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel:249

You think there's actually going to be a new site?   I expect the
issue is that the current site isn't generating a lot of revenue
anymore.  Hard to tell what the webmaster is getting for material.  It
may be a lot of sets that aren't any good.  After a lot of activity,
she's disappeared from Twitter again.  It takes two to argue.  I'm
sure there are issues on both sides.

Still, we can be hopeful things will continue on and content will
improve.

On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 22:52:35 -0400, rebar <rebar@rbar.com> wrote:

>Makes sense. I can't see her shooting something genuinely new for a
>site that's closing down in two weeks. I just hope she starts her new
>site with fresh material.
>
>On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 20:51:04 -0400, cc@cereal.net wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 12:50:44 -0400, rebar <rebar@rbar.com> wrote:
>>
>>>As expected,  her "New Set" looks to be about 1 to 2 years old.
>>>
>>>Thanks for the upload though, Iam
>>
>>Could be. Didn't the web "master" say there were some leftover
>>photosets (assuming they were shot a while back but initially
>>rejected)?

Follow-ups:12345678910
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite