On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:17:34 -0500, Flatlander <flatlander47@cox.net>
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 18:16:56 -0400, rebar <rebar@rbar.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:20:06 -0500, Flatlander <flatlander47@cox.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>He has come up with an action plan and is doing the math for her.
>>>
>>>Yeah...because math is hard.
>>>
>>For Christina it probably is.
>>
>>>Makes you wonder what kind of arrangement she has with the guy who
>>>runs the site, since she doesn't seem to have much control over it. On
>>>the other hand, if she were making the decisions, who knows what kind
>>>of crap we'd be getting.
>>
>>It seems like the webmaster just doesn't care anymore. It really is
>>time for her to get someone new.
>>
>>I've worked as a webmaster before, and when you work with dingbats, it
>>DOES get frustrating. They send a bunch of half-assed material at the
>>last minute that you're supposed to Jenga into something presentable,
>>then they bitch if things aren't exactly right.
>>
>>This is just speculation, but maybe she keeps dropping the ball on her
>>end too (not getting content on time or not sending the type of
>>content he says they need, who knows?), and he's just fed up and tired
>>of tying up the loose ends for her; saying, "if she doesn't care
>>enough to get things right, why should I?"
>>
>>We've seen the crappy lighting quality of some of her videos and
>>photoshoots. He probably gets those, then sees the spelling errors and
>>says, "THIS is what you want to put your name on? If this is the
>>quality you want representing you, then I'm not going to worry about
>>the finer details either. I'm tired of trying to polish a turd."
>>
>>Like you said, if she were making the decisions, who knows what kind
>>of crap we'd be getting.
>>
>>My guess is that the lame spelling and grammar that's actually on the
>>site, like the excuses for no content back in April, was actually
>>written by her, then sent to him to post. He saw the 3rd grade level
>>of language skills, and said, "you know what? I'm going to put this up
>>exactly as it is. I'm not wasting any more time than I have to on this
>>bimbo.
>>
>>It's a very unprofessional attitude for him to take, and if that's the
>>case, then he's as bad as she is, and shouldn't be in the business.
>
>I'll bet you're right. It all comes down to money. She and he both
>want to collect on the work. At least one of them has gotten too lazy
>and is doing less and less for it. So far "getting by", but not by
>much.
>
>I'd guess the webmaster isn't getting a hell of a lot out of this. Not
>to mention the stupidity he's having to put up with. If he were
>professional, I'm not sure what else he'd do except quit. Maybe
>that's happend before, and she's on her 3rd or 4th or 5th webmaster
>with the pool getting shallower all the time.
>
>A lot of sites die out this way. Less and less content. Then posting
>stuff that's already in the can from the past to keep what few new
>subscribers there are trickling in. Then nothing new at all with the
>site running on autopilot until interest completely dies out. They've
>had a good run. Too bad it has to end this way if that is, in fact,
>what's happening.
>
>How many kids has she had, anyway?
None, she has had at least 3 abortions. I was told that by a stripper
while Christina was on stage.
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel/183', 'Re: Twitter convo - "twitter convo.jpg" yEnc')){kind=link}