On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:17:34 -0500, Flatlander <flatlander47@cox.net>
wrote:
>I'll bet you're right. It all comes down to money. She and he both
>want to collect on the work. At least one of them has gotten too lazy
>and is doing less and less for it. So far "getting by", but not by
>much.
>
>I'd guess the webmaster isn't getting a hell of a lot out of this. Not
>to mention the stupidity he's having to put up with. If he were
>professional, I'm not sure what else he'd do except quit. Maybe
>that's happend before, and she's on her 3rd or 4th or 5th webmaster
>with the pool getting shallower all the time.
>
>A lot of sites die out this way. Less and less content. Then posting
>stuff that's already in the can from the past to keep what few new
>subscribers there are trickling in. Then nothing new at all with the
>site running on autopilot until interest completely dies out. They've
>had a good run. Too bad it has to end this way if that is, in fact,
>what's happening.
>
>How many kids has she had, anyway?
You really think she has had other kids? Yeah right.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel/182', 'Re: Twitter convo - "twitter convo.jpg" yEnc')){kind=link}