On 09 May 2010 21:29:19 GMT, "Ludvig_Prinn" <vermis_mysteriis.org>
wrote:
>"jeff.cochran" <jeff.cochran@cox.net> wrote in
>news:FBlZk.12302$%M6.6988@newsfe13.iad:
>
>> Well that may be, but at least he posts in both formats.
>
>That's insane. Absolutely no benefit to either side of this
>ridiculous argument (which should have ended within 3 months of
>yEnc being introduced - I can NOT believe the clueless ones are
>STILL bitching) AND abuse of bandwidth. IMO anyone who posts in
>both formats should have their Usenet account canceled by the
>provider.
>
>I may have him (whoever you are talking about plonked, but if I
>don't, and see a double (ie same pictures in /both/ encoding
>formats) post from anyone, I will report him/her.
>
>People should try to take some trouble and post like
>Mephistopol. Small and perfectly viewable.
>If not for idiots posting fuzzy blurry 3 MB images 3,000 pixels
>wide (or tall) there would have been no great need for yEnc. 600
>pixel wide blurry crap is not much good either, FTM.
>
>> "Vegan" <vegasbob32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:DEiZk.15080$st1.11908@newsfe10.iad...
>>> Yenc sucks
>
>What eloquence and perception.
But correct
|
|