"jeff.cochran" <jeff.cochran@cox.net> wrote in
news:FBlZk.12302$%M6.6988@newsfe13.iad:
> Well that may be, but at least he posts in both formats.
That's insane. Absolutely no benefit to either side of this
ridiculous argument (which should have ended within 3 months of
yEnc being introduced - I can NOT believe the clueless ones are
STILL bitching) AND abuse of bandwidth. IMO anyone who posts in
both formats should have their Usenet account canceled by the
provider.
I may have him (whoever you are talking about plonked, but if I
don't, and see a double (ie same pictures in /both/ encoding
formats) post from anyone, I will report him/her.
People should try to take some trouble and post like
Mephistopol. Small and perfectly viewable.
If not for idiots posting fuzzy blurry 3 MB images 3,000 pixels
wide (or tall) there would have been no great need for yEnc. 600
pixel wide blurry crap is not much good either, FTM.
> "Vegan" <vegasbob32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:DEiZk.15080$st1.11908@newsfe10.iad...
>> Yenc sucks
What eloquence and perception.
|
|