COM@solitaire.net wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2013 13:45:00 GMT, Moz <Moz@doodooface.com> wrote:
>
>>Com... might I ask why this is passworded? We don't normally do
>>that in these groups. There is no explanation that I can find of
>>what this is or why it has a password. Maybe I'm getting old (a
>>fact :)) and cranky but this doesn't seem right to me.
>>
>>
>>Cheers... Moz
>
> This is a special post and if you had been following the posts
> here, you would know.
>
> I'm spending a lot of works on y rips/posts and depending on
> responsers (only 2 are taking their time to respond) I don't see
> any reasons to post for lurkers anymore. So if people are
> interested in my posts, they better say so.
>
> You critiised me in apop for no reason. I had a legit question
> and no critisism. I believed you knew me better.
>
> If Obelix had been living, I would have called him and discussed
> posting PW'd posts and lsiten to what he wuld have to say.
>
> Obelix didn't like the non-response attitude. If you like to
> download my intends, you should reply.
>
> Hope our disagreements not will "kill" our relationship.
>
> COM
>
Com, I understand the desire for feedback from posters and lurkers
alike. I appreciated the same when I was actively posting.
However your statement that you don't see any reason to post for
lurkers anymore troubles me. I was a lurker long before I was a
poster. Some people just prefer to stay in the shadows and not
call attention to themselves. I am not in favor of this trend of
closed groups or inner circles.
Just my opinion.
|
|