On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:33:15 -0800, Solly <solly1@REMOVEnewsguy.com> wrote:
>sitkaman wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:39:06 +0100, etu <etu@lasbud.edu> wrote:
>>
>>snip
>>>
>>>hi sitkaman,
>>>
>>>you might go with RAR/PAR for the movie and serperate PAR for the text
>>>and images and not RAR those so that people can view them straight
>>>away but RAR/PAR for both would also be fine with me.
>>>
>>>keep up the good work, it is `pearls before the swines` and in the
>>>newsgroups there is hardly any feedback but i'm sure plenty people
>>>will be picking up your current posts.
>>>
>>>many greetings, etu.
>>
>>I see your point etu, I relly dont need to RAR the extra files, just post a par or 2 to
>>fix them if broken.
>>
>>I'll start doing that tomorrow!
>>
>>sitkaman
>
>I believe you have found the best choice to please everybody. I have not
>needed any PARs for the support files recently but agree it is nice to have
>them just "incase". I will do the same in any future posts.
>
>I have not been thanking you for each individual post I have DLed (which has
>been many) but I do appreciate them all. Please do continue. Awhile ago,
>mjello and I discussed ways to "revitalize" the group as there was very few
>new DVDs becoming available. Burp was doing a lot to keep people interested
>in the group before his demise. Your efforts should help also.
>
>Thank you.
Solly, it's the least I can do for this group that has made my classic movie collection
enormous.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|
 - "Concerning_Recovery_Files.png" (0/1) 18.6 kBytes yEnc')){kind=link}