sitkaman wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:39:06 +0100, etu <etu@lasbud.edu> wrote:
>
>snip
>>
>>hi sitkaman,
>>
>>you might go with RAR/PAR for the movie and serperate PAR for the text
>>and images and not RAR those so that people can view them straight
>>away but RAR/PAR for both would also be fine with me.
>>
>>keep up the good work, it is `pearls before the swines` and in the
>>newsgroups there is hardly any feedback but i'm sure plenty people
>>will be picking up your current posts.
>>
>>many greetings, etu.
>
>I see your point etu, I relly dont need to RAR the extra files, just post a par or 2 to
>fix them if broken.
>
>I'll start doing that tomorrow!
>
>sitkaman
I believe you have found the best choice to please everybody. I have not
needed any PARs for the support files recently but agree it is nice to have
them just "incase". I will do the same in any future posts.
I have not been thanking you for each individual post I have DLed (which has
been many) but I do appreciate them all. Please do continue. Awhile ago,
mjello and I discussed ways to "revitalize" the group as there was very few
new DVDs becoming available. Burp was doing a lot to keep people interested
in the group before his demise. Your efforts should help also.
Thank you.
--
Solly (remove the REMOVE to E-mail me)
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|
 - "Concerning_Recovery_Files.png" (0/1) 18.6 kBytes yEnc')){kind=link}