Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:53:35 +0200, "bigmama" <antony@bigmama.all>
>wrote:
>
>>:(((
>>
>Because??
>
Because sign language did not get for the requestor
what was expected??????<g>
>Herb asked. I explained. I'm sure He won't mind... Herb??
>
I carnt say (don't know) how long it is you (Pixie)
have been subscribed to ABCP, but I can say that in
what has now just passed six years of (my) reading ABCP
the 'critique' by antony@bigmama.all is maybe the third
I have ever read on anyone's effort in filing a REQ.
for "digitising".
I exclude the banter around Don's<res0y7ux> (and mine)
little joke one Xmas past [attached].
<Don_MeriXmas.hus>
About all I can say about the feedback offered by
antony@bigmama.all is this "at least it was offered".
I guess that is a start.
Your followup in explanation gave me some good clues on
what not do in tackling large designs.
So a huge thanks for that contribution.
As always I myself welcome justified/informed
critique :-)
>I wasn't criticising anyone's effort. Not Herb's. Not yours.
>No! I wasn't!
>
I can read that but seeing as how we are both Aussies
maybe it is a tad easier (to see). Still.... I doubt
anything seen as "negative" is going to get airtime
here (ABCP). Certainly in the past, getting a message
of help through has proved it is easier to brick the
camel then _SHOW_ it the water..!
Ten points for doing what you are obviously well
qualified to do :-)
>It would have been disappointing, (for all concerned) but Herb will
>learn valuable tips from the experience and you will learn what to
>look for in a design.
>
>I am trying to save people 100's of metres of thread sewing out
>designs that are doomed to fail simply because people don't know what
>to look for initially.
/nodding
62K of stitching is indeed a lot of time and material
to throw out simply because one cannot use
editing/viewing software.
>A few hooping clues were thrown in for free if one is determined to
>have a crack at it regardless.
>
>Don't be sad. Be glad. Now you know some of the reasons that
>contributed to the design failing.
>Win/win.
>
And with the clues posted (now) on using Usenet the OP
has to be overjoyed with the results of the
experience..!
>Pixie :-))
>
>ps. You realise that was the fake Hopper in this thread? Yes?
> "That" Hopper can't help you at all.
> The real Hopper does not post using Teranews.
> It's beneath Him.... /grin
>
TN is today a useless port for Usenet.. only suffered
by those who have little choice in NSP :-<
cheers
--
hopper
<< D0n_MeriXmas.hus >>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
|