In article <4d6924a7$0$15999$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com>, xenos
<xenos@anymail.com> wrote:
> Posts seem to be drying up. Have we discouraged LS posters without attracting
> others? I am not ready to give up yet.
Give up what?
Look, you moron, stop trying to control what other people do. Take on
battles you can win. That one, you are doomed to lose. No one gives a
shit about your regulations.
> I am still turning over in my head the
> discussion of the past several days. It seems evident that that there is
> division and division is not good for any group. I have been considering some
> of the suggestions from respondents for instance look at a dormant group or
> go to a.b.lsm. The suggestions have fostered a possibility in my head, one
> that would work toward returning a site to its original focus. Ls group A has
> no recent spam. It does have a lot of junk posts, but these are old, 750 to
> 860 days. There is very little below 700 days. Thus the junk will disappear
> over the next few months leaving the group open.
You have named the group already. That is the kiss of death. As soon as
you start posting, the spammers will be in there.
Stop making so many newbie mistakes. Stop, think, shut up. Spend a
while lurking in a group before thinking you know everything and start
posting bullshit. People are alternately laughing at you and cringing.
|
|