Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:20:22 +0100
From: SpeeD <SpeeD@GatesKeeper.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: viwa.crack.and.hack
Subject: Re: question (and poll?) for security professionals
References: <1132251983.524725.133700@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1132251983.524725.133700@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <43c247de$0$11072$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.84.1.2
X-Trace: 1136805854 news.xs4all.nl 11072 [::ffff:213.84.1.2]:47332
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: news.nzbot.com viwa.crack.and.hack:871
alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are a number of security specialized Linux live-CDs out there,
> including:
>
> * Knoppix-STD
> * Local Area Security Linux
> * Phlak
> * Whax
> * Auditor Security Linux
> * Linux Defender
> * Erpross Live (in German only)
> * Arudius
> * Operator
>
> Which, if any, do you use? Why? Can you compare/contrat these tools?
> Which would you reccommend to an aspiring security professional?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alex
>
i use Auditor and knoppix-std mostly
|
|