Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:49:54 -0500
Newsgroups: alt
Subject: Re: Bader-Ginsburg & Stevens soon off the High Court
From: nraclaptrap <nraclaptrap@invalid.invalid>
References: <E9CdnTtYx4EI4CHXnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@giganews.com> <363dee8d-2dfd-4420-b508-31511ffc1ca6@v2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <idjpb5l9spt0jl0fpvpt7ig8jhb3bi3bss@4ax.com> <Xns9C917658B5882piotu0345go2r3ndec@216.196.97.131> <ca7b88a1-e0e0-40fa-a6b8-cad688f70617@l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <Xns9C91DF97918CDpiotu0345go2r3ndec@216.196.97.131> <i78rb5lank4g648fitd5ubcc7b9unveos5@4ax.com>
Message-ID: <Xns9C926E2C6FF4piotu0345go2r3ndec@216.196.97.131>
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.24
X-Face: -RVCHNSz3]BI/e1s!m{k;]D!Xw.y:Pm8t.YiNjw/_Z/yRQ`}!Vs(QcMZ')mVaKs!=}>lFy;D)4t2;?45AA><RA%07>V1[<//DqGBp.O'l1H+kbh?^m{2R^L
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:49:54 -0500
Lines: 68
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-17XVkWhRVgqbPfnyAwchyiVfdN8BeuqAI1Lfnw40a5fH4t3um8YgO/eygZa82tZ4qBaPyd39TXMrmBi!c6/ltrRUCTl0mHmTFvJPc06hZOkRoWknHdqmvug8pnMsh2KrzDvzU6aYfcANoqkEHxx5EzTFlPod!p0U=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt:805
Zombywoof <Zomby-Woof@cox.net> wrote in
news:i78rb5lank4g648fitd5ubcc7b9unveos5@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:58:51 -0500, nraclaptrap
> <nraclaptrap@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>"editor@netpath.net" <editor@netpath.net> wrote in
>>news:ca7b88a1-e0e0-40fa-a6b8-cad688f70617@l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com:
>>> On Sep 25, 12:38 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> By and large, President Clinton would make a GREAT Supreme Court
>>>> Justice!
>>>
>>> Too bad he's DISBARRED.
>>
>>First, do US Supreme Court rules say that a person disbarred by the
>>Court can't be a SC justice if appointed?
>>
>>I don't see it. Maybe your NRA lawloons can whip up a fake cite.
>>
>>And Clinton wasn't disbarred from the Arkansas Supreme Court or from
>>the US Supreme Court bar - BEDWETTER.
>>
> Mien Gott are you one of the biggest idiots in the highest level of
> self-denial I've ever seen. Why not do a little bit of research prior
> to blowing one like this out your ass?
>
> On Monday, Oct. 1, 2001 The Supreme Court ordered former President
> Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court on Monday
> and gave him 40 days to contest the order. He never did.
Yeah, I also saw the Drudge & Fox archived webpages dated October 1,
2001.
Too bad you failed to check their bullshit against your willingness to be
fucked in the ear, eh ZombieWuss?
See Wikipedia.
> The court did not explain its reasons, but Supreme Court disbarment
> often follows disbarment in lower courts.
>
> In April 2001, Clinton's Arkansas law license was suspended for five
> years and he paid a $25,000 fine. The original disbarment lawsuit was
> brought by a committee of the Arkansas Supreme Court.
What you refuse to accept is that after 5 years Clinton's license was
renewed and he was never disbarred.
> There are no fines associated with the Supreme Court action.
>
> Clinton agreed to the Arkansas fine and suspension Jan. 19, the day
> before he left office, as part of an understanding with Independent
> Counsel Robert Ray to end the Monica Lewinsky investigation.
>
> The agreement also satisfied the legal effort by the Arkansas Supreme
> Court Committee on Professional Conduct to disbar Clinton for giving
> misleading testimony in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case.
Which was not perjury. In fact, his testimony using definitions written
by Jones' own lawyers was truthful.
--
NRACLAPTRAP
|
|