altShow header Prev. Next
Re: Accused may have thought police were home invaders
Bob (bob@n0spam.net) 2006/12/17 20:53


"klunk" <klunk@theothershoe.org> wrote in message
news:kMihh.495441$5R2.236534@pd7urf3no...
>

> news:cd9bo2l00p7opkofshss9dqodgp1gkbnuv@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:56:15 GMT, "klunk" <klunk@theothershoe.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>

>>>news:v7iao2hld53isi3qnp4fg7ntkfjqnrpjqo@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:48:01 GMT, "klunk" <klunk@theothershoe.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Bob" <bob@n0spam.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:hJLgh.58$8r7.47@newsfe02.lga...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "klunk" <klunk@theothershoe.org> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:HdLgh.492574$R63.407995@pd7urf1no...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Peter Franks" <none@none.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:_yGgh.4229$RR4.1523@newsfe22.lga...
>>>>>>>> klunk wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Peter Franks" <none@none.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:zSzgh.83275$G87.7263@newsfe14.lga...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>klunk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"Peter Franks" <none@none.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>news:KcUfh.5642$a14.663@newsfe24.lga...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>klunk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>if you actually read the update, you would actually know that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>to date actually implicates him...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Such as?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>such as you should read the update yourself...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I have, several times.  I don't see anything that substantiates
>>>>>>>>>>your
>>>>>>>>>>conclusions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> riiiight... you just conveniently ignore the criminal gang
>>>>>>>>> affililations...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You have failed to substantiate any of your claims.  Your argument
>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>> been summarily dismissed without further consideration.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you have failed to even participate in any form of examination of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> issues... your stupidity has been summarily dismissed... piss off
>>>>>>> now,
>>>>>>> peterless...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yea... you're dismissing him.... moron...
>>>>>
>>>>>i'm dismissing you too, idiot... none of you ignorant fucks seem to
>>>>>like
>>>>>to
>>>>>deal with the facts... even you, knob... you've not once attempted to
>>>>>inject
>>>>>anything into this exchange other than to offer your own insipid
>>>>>version
>>>>>of
>>>>>pre-cum myopia... go fuck off now and masturbate over your guns like
>>>>>the
>>>>>rabid gun loon you are...
>>>>
>>>> Wow!!
>>>>
>>>> You aren't one of "Brocks"  multiple identities are you?
>>>
>>>no... but it should be no surprise that the rabidity that's been openly
>>>displayed by gun-loons would only create more such "brocks"... gun-loons
>>>should really think twice about this particular pandora's box that they
>>>seek
>>>to open with their callous disdain for public safety... it's only going
>>>to
>>>get them burned in the long run...
>>
>> You really haven't been paying attention have you?
>> it isn't the guns or the law abiding gun owners,  it is the people who
>> are willing to use intimidation, fear, theats, injury, and even murder
>> others who are the problem.  Take the guns out of society and these
>> people will turn to other methods.
>> The gun does not instigate or incite these people to do this, their
>> moral values and attitudes allow them to do it.
>
> obviously, you're the one who hasn't been paying attention... no one cares
> about responsible, law-abiding citizens owning guns...

Then why are gun laws always aimed at the law abiding citizens?



Next Prev. Article List         Favorite