Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail  
From: "Thomas Trust" <Trust@Americanpride.com>  
Newsgroups: alt  
References: <u39ssv4nloejnvispal2lubltj7jurr70n@4ax.com> <eIpzb.408556$Tr4.1171321@attbi_s03> <53bssvcfet6g7nlaurvlp1e5ksj644fkno@4ax.com> <Fgqzb.405656$HS4.3265793@attbi_s01> <vssp0e56479561@corp.supernews.com>  
Subject: Re: Media censored Bush photo-op in Iraq  
Lines: 40  
X-Priority: 3  
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal  
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158  
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165  
Message-ID: <81uzb.406875$HS4.3276739@attbi_s01>  
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.215.146.42  
X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com  
X-Trace: attbi_s01 1070492868 12.215.146.42 (Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:07:48 GMT)  
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:07:48 GMT  
Organization: MediaCom High Speed Internet  
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:07:48 GMT  
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt:56  
  
  
"Jeffrey Turner" <jturner@localnet.com> wrote in message  
news:vssp0e56479561@corp.supernews.com...  
> Thomas Trust wrote:  
> > <Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH> wrote:  
> >>On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:12:26 GMT, "Thomas Trust"  
> >><Trust@Americanpride.com> wrote:  
> >>><Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH> wrote:  
> >>>  
> >>>>13 journalists were invited to accompany bush on his Thansgiving day  
> >>>>trip to the troops in Iraq.  But they were told they couldn't tell  
> >>>>their family or even their editor about it!!.  Why did the press go  
> >>>>along with that restriction?  This was nothing but a photo-op for bush  
> >>>>and the press had no obligation to keep the story secret until the WH  
> >>>>gave them the OK to tell the world.  Goddam bush toadies in the media  
> >>>>are flat-out working for the GOP.  
> >>>  
> >>>Dream on.  The security reasons behind such precautions is obvious.  
> >>  
> >>Then the trip should have been cancelled.  This was not news, just a  
> >>photo-op and the press has no obligation to censor itself to help bush  
> >>win votes. Next question.  
> >  
> > No, the Commander in Chief can visit troops if he damn well pleases.  
The  
> > actual visit isn't what bothers you, it's that he's doing the right  
thing  
> > and looking good doing it is what's bothering you, it pisses you off.  
>  
> It's empty symbolism.  Now the president can go back to cutting  
> veterans' benefits and other programs that benefit regular Americans.  
> Did you get all choked up about the pardoning of the (other) White  
> House turkey, too?  
>  
  
  
Cite your cut claims.  And for the record, I think the turkey tradition is  
ridiculous.  
  
  
 |  
  
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |  
  |