in post: <news:xZsIc.90759$sj4.72713@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
rf <rf@.invalid> said:
> Oh My &deity; I have just read this statement again
please watch your blood pressure.
> You go on to mention that sometimes it does not work, however if it does not
> then there is a hardware problem. Is that correct? It is not a clearthype
> problem? Right? It's a hardware problem.
if you have multiple high end graphics cards and a DPI other than the
default 96. its a cleartype problem. the text becomes so anti-aliased it
anti-aliases itself out of existence regardless of what size it is. all
text just disappears, if you look really carefully you can see a slight
grey smudge where the text is supposed to be.
on the other hand the "standard" font smoothing option works without a
problem (for me) but it still has a large performance hit (at least it
does driving 6 monitors).
linux's nice smooth fonts are exceptional, its like looking at a printed
page. unfortunately linux has other display problems.
> There are words for people like you, however it's against my ISPs TOS to use
> them.
not mine.
--
b r u c i e
|
|