Malcolm McMahon <malcolm@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote in
news:part1of1.1.yugAR7dcjx2G8A@ue.ph:
> "Wile E. Coyote" <nuke_them_from_orbit@sulaco.com> wrote:
>>Malcolm McMahon <malcolm@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote in
>>news:part1of1.1.k$rY58B74VhAhw@ue.ph:
>>
>>> "Wile E. Coyote" <nuke_them_from_orbit@sulaco.com> wrote:
>>>>Malcolm McMahon <malcolm@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote in
>>>>news:part1of1.1.wLk0skSXGECczw@ue.ph:
>>>>
>>>>> The Only Rightist Is A Gutless Rightist <gopPutin@rump.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>The Coward of Broward County ... Chickenshit Peterson - A Typical
>>>>>>Rightist With A Gun
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Had he gone in, how would you rate his chances? 50/50? Under such
>>>>> circumstances victory goes not to the virtuous, but to he who fires
>>>>> first, and a spree shooter doesn't have to hesitate and check what
>>>>> he's aiming at.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nobody who hasn't faced such a decision gets to say what they'd do.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Shooter is shhoting, ie calling attention to himself. Cop knows what he
>>>>is doing, he is moving to the sound of the gunfire. Shooter does not
>>>>know he is being stalked and continues to give away his position.
>>>>
>>>
>>> But then the shooter, having no doubt trained on innumerable zombie
>>> games, will simply fire at anything that moves. Cop, on the other hand,
>>> needs those extra milliseconds to identify his target. Milliseconds he
>>> may not have. It probably comes down to which way the shooter was
facing
>>> when the cop entered the room.
>>>
>>> I'd still say 50/50. Body armour might make a difference.
>>
>>I'd say you have no idea what you are talking about.
>>
>
> You've done it then? Won a firefight against an armed and ready opponent?
>
Have you?
Because I carry it is incumbent on me to think about what myght happen.
It's Ok that you are a coward. A braver man may be able to save your ass.
--
It's time for the students to step up their game and kill people like
Coulter.
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> April 25, 2017
|
|