Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Monty" <nomeneither@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.tv
References: <41bb29d3$1_1@news.iprimus.com.au> <m2wtvoyxol.fsf@greybat.rattus.net> <S3Qud.69527$K7.53377@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <m2oeh0yv4i.fsf@greybat.rattus.net> <VpQud.69641$K7.38036@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <m27jnoynwl.fsf@greybat.rattus.net>
Subject: Re: Sign my petition - Homophobia to be added to the mentall illness list...
Lines: 56
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID: <vMSud.69865$K7.42171@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 07:51:55 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.217.243.155
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au
X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1102837915 138.217.243.155 (Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:51:55 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:51:55 EST
Organization: BigPond Internet Services
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.tv:292
"Bruce Murphy" <pack-news@rattus.net> wrote in message
news:m27jnoynwl.fsf@greybat.rattus.net...
> "Monty" <nomeneither@hotmail.com> writes:
>
>> "Bruce Murphy" <pack-news@rattus.net> wrote in message
>> news:m2oeh0yv4i.fsf@greybat.rattus.net...
>> > But killing all the people who think that it's a valid word will
cause
>> > a different, and frankly more important, mental affliction to
>> > disappear. Particularly if you keep doing it.
>>
>> It will merely spawn a new word.
>
> Good. And if we kill all the cretins who think that this one is a
> valid word, it will be a _better_ word. Of course, using the perfectly
> good existing words would also work.
>
>> "Political correctness" proves nothing.
>> It merely replaces one word with another. Years ago children with
Downs
>> Syndrome were called "spastics", "Mongoloids" and even once "Plus One
Kids"
>> (due to that extra chromosome). Yet these kids still exist to this
day.
>> Changing the name did not make the illness go away.
>
> Who cares? Perhaps you should stop trying to apply your pointless
> pop-psychology and accept that what I am calling for is immediate and
> total sanctions against the people who think that it is a valid word.
>
>> Same argument holds true for "Wogs", "Daygos" and a heap of other
names.
>
> Actually, wog has a very interesting etymology. Back in the post
> DP-immigration days of the 50s and 60s, it became extremely difficult
> to avoid misidentifying various immigrant populations with similar but
> historically offensive ones.
>
> Consequently, the only background-offensive-level 'wog' passed into
> being.
>
>> Maybe you were a bit strong with using the word "killing" whereas
"banning
>> the word" would have been a better option.
>
> No, banning the word without killing or lobotomising the people would
> merely leave them free to create *another* stupid word.
>
> B>
Gee, I'm soooo glad you're not running the country.
(Cross-postings deleted)
|
|