"Ben Goren" <ben@trumpetpower.com> wrote in message
news:42a8da8d$1_2@spool9-west.superfeed.net...
> (rec.ponds excluded from the reply. Indeed, that's the only reason
> I'm bothering to reply--to try to save the poor sods.)
>
> Kathy wrote:
>
> > Why would any woman want to terminate the life of a human that
> > is developing within herself?
>
> Either because what is inside her does not yet meet her definition
> of human (even if it meets your definition) or because she is in
> the tragic position of having to choose between her life and
> safety and the life of another.\
That is your morbid excuse for all abortions?
> I doubt that ``want'' is ever the most appropriate term, either.
So, why are they getting what so many of them do NOT want?
> I
> know of nobody who thinks of abortion as a good thing; simply
> something that, on occasion, is that which causes the least harm
> to the fewest people.
Occasion?
Are abortion clinics open on Christmas and July 4th. etc?
Or are abortions performed as part of marriage ceremonies?
What occasion are you referring to?
> It's never a good choice, but it may well be the least worst
> choice. Regardless, the choice must ever be the woman's (with the
> advice (but not consent) ideally of the father and certainly the
> physician).
Too bad it isn't written into law like that, huh?
|
|