In article <1111807441.753234.278520@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
<srprozak@gmail.com> wrote:
> - Unreliable: break frequently, and crash even more frequently.
I've had the exact opposite experience.
> - Expensive: 3-5x what you'd pay for a decent Intel/AMD machine.
FIVE times? Perhaps 1.5. You weaken your argument by exaggerating.
> - Trendy: at least among social defectives.
Never saw anything trendy in ANY machine the primary purpose of which
is juggling zeroes and ones.
> - Marketed toward self-identity: rewards ego-dependent whores for their
> uniqueness.
Like corpse paint?
> - Company is unreliable: never had a strategy, never will.
Stock is quadruple what I paid for it. If that's lack of strategy, I'll
take more.
> - Caters to the meek: company loves retarded gay dwarves of mixed race
> more than a healthy person of healthy family.
Uh ... err ... ummm .... well, you got me on that one, Prozak.
And I STILL enjoy anus.com!
|
|